Oklo vs. Nano Nuclear Energy

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) and Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ: NNE) are both pre-revenue nuclear start-ups chasing the same multitrillion-dollar opportunity: small nuclear reactors that could one day provide clean, always-on power to artificial intelligence (AI) data centers and other power-hungry customers.

Between the two, Oklo has the edge on partnerships, while Nano’s valuation looks more reasonable. Let’s take a closer at both to see which one is the better nuclear energy stock today.

Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an “Indispensable Monopoly” providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Image source: Getty Images.

Oklo: A rich valuation with big-name backers

Oklo is designing a small nuclear reactor called an Aurora powerhouse. These reactors are engineered to run on both recycled fuel and high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), a one-two punch that could make them more efficient, more flexible, and less dependent on the traditional nuclear fuel supply chain.

Oklo’s strength is its partnerships. Never mind early backing by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Oklo now has major partnerships with Meta Platforms, Switch, Equinix, Nvidia, Vertiv, Liberty Energy, Blykalla, and RPower.

The biggest opportunities for future revenue growth are the first three — Meta, Switch, and Equinix — which together equal about 14 gigawatts (GW) of potential power demand, or enough to require about 187 full-sized 75 megawatt (MW) Aurora powerhouses, if Oklo were to supply it all.

If we assume about $40 to $90 per megawatt-hour, Oklo’s stated target price range, a full-sized 75 MW powerhouse could generate about $26 million to $59 million in annual revenue. At that rate, its 14 GW backlog clocks in around $4.9 billion to $11 billion — still below its $12.5 billion market cap.

With a price-to-book ratio around 8 and zero revenue to its name, Oklo already commands a premium valuation. It’s not cheap, but the size of its potential demand explains why investors are still willing to pay up.

Nano: An earlier play in a burgeoning industry

Nano Nuclear Energy is also designing small nuclear reactors. Like Oklo, the company is pre-revenue and lacks the regulatory approval to operate commercially.

Nano doesn’t have as many star-studded partners as Oklo, but it does have a fairly big one: Super Micro Computer (NASDAQ: SMCI). Earlier in May 2026, the two companies signed a memorandum of understanding to deploy Nano’s microreactors for Super Micro Computers’ data centers.

Although it’s unclear what the revenue potential could be, the partnership is a good sign that customers are willing to explore Nano’s technology before it has even reached regulatory approval.

On that front, however, Oklo appears to be ahead. It’s had a longer relationship with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and it’s currently working with the agency to build its first powerhouse at the Idaho National Laboratory. Last week, the NRC approved the Principal Design Criteria (PDC) topical report for its Aurora powerhouse. While that doesn’t mean the reactor itself is licensed, it does set a safety framework that can be referenced in future applications, thus reducing repeat work.

Nano, for its part, has started building a research reactor for the University of Illinois. Although it won’t generate commercial revenue, it could allow Nano to validate that its technology works safely.

Which is better for investors today: Oklo or Nano?

Oklo has the stronger business case. Not only does it have major tech partners, but it also has a backlog of projects that can generate meaningful revenue. Even though it’s still pre-revenue today, it’ll likely turn on the spigot within the next two years, as the chart below shows.

OKLO Revenue (TTM) Chart — Data by YCharts

That said, Nano Nuclear could provide more upside from here. Trading at $26 a share, Nano carries a market cap of about $1.4 billion — a fraction of Oklo’s $12.5 billion. While that’s still richly valued for a pre-revenue company, it seems much more reasonable than Oklo’s much steeper valuation.

Should you buy stock in Oklo right now?

Before you buy stock in Oklo, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Oklo wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 11, 2026.

Steven Porrello has positions in Nano Nuclear Energy, Nvidia, and Oklo. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Equinix, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Vertiv. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Better Nuclear Energy Stock: Oklo vs. Nano Nuclear Energy was originally published by The Motley Fool

Source link